Lesotho

Go back

Results are from an analysis of the 2018 Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey 6 (MICS6). Information on methodology is in the main text of the report and in the methods briefs.

Key indicators on the deprivations and wellbeing experienced by women with and without functional difficulties are presented in Table 1. Table 1 begins with information on the multidimensional poverty headcount—the rate of women deprived in more than one dimension in the areas of education, health, and standard of living. Women with at least a lot of functional difficulty have a multidimensional poverty headcount of 29% compared to 24% for women with some functional difficulty and 25% for women with no difficulty.

Table 1_Lesotho: Key indicators for women age 18 to 49 by functional difficulty status (% and percentage points)

Indicator No
Difficulty
Some
Difficulty
Difference
between no
difficulty and
some difficulty
At least a
lot of
difficulty
Difference
between no
difficulty and at
least a lot of
difficulty
Multidimensional poverty headcount 25 24 1 29 -4
Less than primary school 11 12 -1 20 -9***
Owns a mobile phone 90 90 0 87 4*
Safely managed drinking water 91 93 -1 92 0
Safely managed sanitation 45 48 -3 48 -3
Clean fuel
Electricity 49 54 -5** 53 -3
Adequate housing 69 73 -3** 73 -3
Owns assets 30 31 -1* 29 1
Having felt discriminated against or harassed 12 22 -10*** 26 -13***
Happiness: very or somewhat happy 67 64 3* 55 12***

Notes: *, **, and *** indicate that the difference is statistically significant at the 10%, 5% and 1% levels respectively. ‘-‘ indicates not available. Numbers in the difference columns are in percentage points while all other numbers in the table are percentages. The share of women having felt discriminated against or harassed is on the basis of any ground.

Source: Lesotho 2018 MICS6, own calculations

Education

The share of women ages 18 to 49 who have less than primary school as their highest level of schooling attained is higher among women with at least a lot of functional difficulty (20%) and women with some difficulty (12%) compared to women with no difficulty (11%). This boils down to gaps of nine percentage points (p.p.). between women with at least a lot of difficulty and no difficulty and one p.p. between women with some functional difficulty and no difficulty.

Personal Activities

Women with at least a lot of functional difficulty are less likely to own a mobile phone than women with no difficulty, at 87% and 90%, respectively. At 90%, women with some difficulty are just as likely to own a mobile phone as women with no difficulty.

Health

For safely managed water and sanitation, differences across functional difficulty status are small (three p.p. or lower) and not statistically significant.

Standard of Living

There are differences in terms of the shares of individuals with electricity, adequate housing, and asset ownership, with higher rates for women with some difficulty and at least a lot of difficulty compared to women with no difficulty. For all indicators, however, these differences are statistically significant only between women with some difficulty and women with no difficulty.

Insecurity

Women with some difficulty and at least a lot of difficulty are more likely to report feeling discriminated against or harassed based on any ground, at rates of 22% and 26% compared to 12% of women with no difficulty.

Subjective Wellbeing

Women with at least a lot of functional difficulty are significantly less likely to report feeling very or somewhat happy than women with no difficulty, at 55% and 67%, respectively. At 64%, women with some difficulty also have lower rates of happiness compared to women with no difficulty.

More results for Lesotho are available in Results Tables on the DDI website.