Guyana

Go back

Results are from an analysis of the 2019-20 Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey 6 (MICS6). Information on methodology is in the main text of the report and in the methods briefs.

Key indicators on the deprivations and wellbeing experienced by women with and without functional difficulties are presented in Table 1. Table 1 begins with information on the multidimensional poverty headcount—the rate of women deprived in more than one dimension in the areas of education, health, and standard of living. Women with at least a lot of functional difficulty have a multidimensional poverty headcount of 19% compared to 11% for women with some functional difficulty and 9% for women with no difficulty.

Table 1_Guyana: Key indicators for women age 18 to 49 by functional difficulty status (% and percentage points)

Indicator No
Difficulty
Some
Difficulty
Difference
between no
difficulty and
some difficulty
At least a
lot of
difficulty
Difference
between no
difficulty and at
least a lot of
difficulty
Multidimensional poverty headcount 9 11 -2 19 -9**
Less than primary school 5 6 -2* 12 -8***
Owns a mobile phone 91 89 3** 79 12***
Safely managed drinking water 83 84 -1 84 -1
Safely managed sanitation 92 90 2* 87 5
Clean fuel 80 80 0 64 16***
Electricity 89 88 1 83 6*
Adequate housing 56 55 0 52 4
Owns assets 56 56 0 50 7***
Having felt discriminated against or harassed 9 17 -8*** 25 -16***
Happiness: very or somewhat happy

Notes: *, **, and *** indicate that the difference is statistically significant at the 10%, 5% and 1% levels respectively. ‘-‘ indicates not available. Numbers in the difference columns are in percentage points while all other numbers in the table are percentages. The share of women having felt discriminated against or harassed is on the basis of any ground.

Source: Guinea-Bissau 2018-19 MICS6, own calculations

Education

The share of women ages 18 to 49 who have less than primary school as their highest level of schooling attained is significantly higher among women with at least a lot of functional difficulty (12%) and women with some difficulty (6%) compared to women with no difficulty (5%). This boils down to gaps of eight percentage points (p.p.) between women with at least a lot of difficulty and no difficulty and two p.p. between women with some functional difficulty and no difficulty.

Personal Activities

Women with at least a lot of functional difficulty are less likely to own a mobile phone than women with no difficulty, at 79% and 91%, respectively. At 89%, women with some difficulty are also less likely to own a mobile phone than women with no difficulty.

Health

Differences across functional difficulty status are small (five p.p. or lower) for safely managed water and sanitation.

Standard of Living

There are significant differences in terms of the shares of individuals with clean fuel, electricity, and asset ownership, with lower rates for women with some difficulty and even lower rates for women with at least a lot of difficulty. For all indicators, however, the differences are statistically significant only between women with at least a lot of difficulty and women with no difficulty. Rates of adequate housing are similar for the different functional difficulty groups.

Insecurity

Women with some difficulty and at least a lot of difficulty are more likely to report feeling discriminated against or harassed based on any ground, at rates of 17% and 25% compared to 9% of women with no difficulty.

More results for Guyana are available in Results Tables on the DDI website.