Mongolia

Go back

Results are from an analysis of the 2018 Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey 6 (MICS6). Information on methodology is in the main text of the report and in the methods briefs.

Key indicators on the deprivations and wellbeing experienced by women with and without functional difficulties are presented in Table 1. Table 1 begins with information on the multidimensional poverty headcount—the rate of women deprived in more than one dimension in the areas of education, health, and standard of living. Women with at least a lot of functional difficulty have a multidimensional poverty headcount of 40% compared to 32% for women with some functional difficulty and 29% for women with no difficulty.

Table 1_Mongolia: Key indicators for women age 18 to 49 by functional difficulty status (% and percentage points)

Indicator No
Difficulty
Some
Difficulty
Difference
between no
difficulty and
some difficulty
At least a
lot of
difficulty
Difference
between no
difficulty and at
least a lot of
difficulty
Multidimensional poverty headcount 29 32 -2* 40 -11***
Less than primary school 3 4 0 8 -5***
Owns a mobile phone 80 76 4*** 61 19***
Safely managed drinking water 60 58 2 51 8***
Safely managed sanitation 71 68 3** 59 12***
Clean fuel 56 53 3* 40 16***
Electricity 86 86 1 77 9***
Adequate housing 50 49 1 45 5
Owns assets 37 36 0 30 7***
Having felt discriminated against or harassed 7 12 -5*** 18 -11***
Happiness: very or somewhat happy 88 82 6*** 71 18***

Notes: *, **, and *** indicate that the difference is statistically significant at the 10%, 5% and 1% levels respectively. Numbers in the difference columns are in percentage points while all other numbers in the table are percentages. The share of women having felt discriminated against or harassed is on the basis of any ground.

Source: Mongolia 2018 MICS6, own calculations

Education

The share of women ages 18 to 49 who have less than primary school as their highest level of schooling attained is higher among women with at least a lot of functional difficulty (8%) and women with some difficulty (4%) compared to women with no difficulty (3%). This boils down to gaps of five percentage points (p.p.) between women with at least a lot of difficulty and no difficulty and zero p.p. between women with some functional difficulty and no difficulty.

Personal Activities

Women with at least a lot of functional difficulty are less likely to own a mobile phone than women with no difficulty, at 61% and 80%, respectively. At 76%, women with some difficulty are also less likely to own a mobile phone than women with no difficulty.

Health

There are significant differences in terms of the shares of individuals with access to safely managed drinking water and sanitation, with lower rates for women with some difficulty and even lower rates for women with at least a lot of difficulty. in the case of safely managed drinking water, the difference is statistically significant only between women with at least a lot of difficulty and women with no difficulty.

Standard of Living

There are significant differences in terms of the shares of individuals with clean fuel, electricity, and asset ownership, with lower rates for women with some difficulty and even lower rates for women with at least a lot of difficulty. Rates of adequate housing are overall similar for the different functional difficulty groups.

Insecurity

Women with some difficulty and at least a lot of difficulty are more likely to report feeling discriminated against or harassed based on any ground, at rates of 12% and 18% compared to 7% of women with no difficulty.

Subjective Wellbeing

Women with at least a lot of functional difficulty are significantly less likely to report feeling very or somewhat happy than women with no difficulty, at 71% and 88%, respectively. At 82%, women with some difficulty also have lower rates of happiness compared to women with no difficulty.

More results for Mongolia are available in Results Tables on the DDI website.