Georgia
Go back Results are from an analysis of the 2018 Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey 6 (MICS6). Information on methodology is in the main text of the report and in the methods briefs.
Key indicators on the deprivations and wellbeing experienced by women with and without functional difficulties are presented in Table 1. Table 1 begins with information on the multidimensional poverty headcount—the rate of women deprived in more than one dimension in the areas of education, health, and standard of living. Women with at least a lot of functional difficulty have a multidimensional poverty headcount of 6% compared to 6% for women with some functional difficulty and 5% for women with no difficulty.
Table 1_Georgia: Key indicators for women age 18 to 49 by functional difficulty status (% and percentage points)
| Indicator | No Difficulty |
Some Difficulty |
Difference between no difficulty and some difficulty |
At least a lot of difficulty |
Difference between no difficulty and at least a lot of difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Multidimensional poverty headcount | 5 | 6 | -1 | 6 | -1 |
| Less than primary school | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Owns a mobile phone | – | – | – | – | – |
| Safely managed drinking water | 98 | 98 | 0 | 98 | 1 |
| Safely managed sanitation | 94 | 92 | 1* | 91 | 2 |
| Clean fuel | 10 | 11 | -2* | 12 | -3 |
| Electricity | 100 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 0 |
| Adequate housing | 65 | 63 | 2 | 63 | 2 |
| Owns assets | 55 | 54 | 1* | 51 | 4*** |
| Having felt discriminated against or harassed | 4 | 7 | -3*** | 10 | -6*** |
| Happiness: very or somewhat happy | 91 | 86 | 5*** | 79 | 12*** |
Notes: *, **, and *** indicate that the difference is statistically significant at the 10%, 5% and 1% levels respectively. ‘-‘ indicates not available. Numbers in the difference columns are in percentage points while all other numbers in the table are percentages. The share of women having felt discriminated against or harassed is on the basis of any ground.
Source: Georgia 2018 MICS6, own calculations
Education
The shares of women ages 18 to 49 who have less than primary school as their highest level of schooling attained are overall similar for the different functional difficulty groups.
Health
Differences across functional difficulty status are very small (two p.p. or lower) for safely managed water and sanitation.
Standard of Living
Rates of access to clean fuel are higher among women with some or at least a lot of difficulty compared to women with no difficulty, but the difference is statistically significant only between women with some difficulty and women with no difficulty. Rates of electricity and adequate housing are overall similar for the different functional difficulty groups. There are small but significant differences in terms of the shares of individuals who own assets, with lower rates for women with some difficulty and even lower rates for women with at least a lot of difficulty.
Insecurity
Women with some difficulty and at least a lot of difficulty are more likely to report feeling discriminated against or harassed based on any ground, at rates of 7% and 10% compared to 4% of women with no difficulty.
Subjective Wellbeing
Women with at least a lot of functional difficulty are significantly less likely to report feeling very or somewhat happy than women with no difficulty, at 79% and 91%, respectively. At 86%, women with some difficulty also have lower rates of happiness compared to women with no difficulty.
More results for Georgia are available in Results Tables on the DDI website.