Tajikistan
Results are from an analysis of the 2016 Survey of Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH). Information on methodology is in the report and in the method briefs.
Prevalence of Functional Difficulties
In Tajikistan, the share of adults aged 15 and older with any functional difficulty stands at 17.7%. Separating by level of difficulty, the prevalence rates of some difficulty and at least a lot of difficulty are 14% and 3.7% respectively. The prevalence of functional difficulties is higher for women (18.3%) than for men (17.1%). Functional difficulties are more prevalent among older age groups, at 5.7% for ages 15 to 29, 11.3% for ages 30 to 44, 34.6% for ages 45 to 64, and 64.4% for ages 65 and over. Across the six functional domains considered, difficulties with mobility (10.2%) and seeing (8.3%) are most common.
At the household level, the prevalence of any functional difficulty is at 47.1%, including 33.7% with some difficulty and 13.5% with at least a lot of difficulty. The prevalence of functional difficulties is similar in rural areas compared to urban areas: 18.8% vs. 17.3% among adults and 45.5% vs. 48% among households, for rural and urban areas, respectively.
Table 1: Tajikistan: Prevalence of functional difficulties (%)
Group | Any difficulty | Some difficulty | At least a lot of difficulty |
---|---|---|---|
All adults | 17.72 | 14.04 | 3.68 |
Females | 18.31 | 14.49 | 3.82 |
Males | 17.11 | 13.58 | 3.53 |
Rural residents | 18.79 | 15.10 | 3.69 |
Urban residents | 17.29 | 13.62 | 3.67 |
Ages 15 to 29 | 5.70 | 4.57 | 1.14 |
Ages 30 to 44 | 11.34 | 9.45 | 1.89 |
Ages 45 to 64 | 34.59 | 29.79 | 4.80 |
Ages 65 and over | 64.41 | 39.06 | 25.36 |
Seeing | 8.25 | 7.13 | 1.12 |
Hearing | 4.27 | 3.64 | 0.64 |
Mobility | 10.20 | 8.18 | 2.02 |
Cognitive | 6.69 | 5.77 | 0.92 |
Self-care | 3.12 | 1.94 | 1.18 |
Communication | 1.77 | 1.10 | 0.67 |
All households | 47.13 | 33.67 | 13.47 |
Rural households | 45.51 | 33.40 | 12.11 |
Urban households | 47.95 | 33.80 | 14.14 |
Source: Tajikistan 2016 WASH, own calculations
Key indicators on the deprivations and wellbeing experienced by persons with and without functional difficulties are presented in Table 2. Table 2 begins with information on the multidimensional poverty headcount—the rate of persons deprived in more than one dimension in the areas of education, work, health, and standard of living. Persons with at least a lot of functional difficulty have a multidimensional poverty headcount of 92% compared to 67% for persons with some functional difficulty and 64% for persons with no difficulty.
Table 2: Tajikistan: Key indicators for adults age 15+ by functional difficulty status (% and percentage points)
Indicator | No Difficulty | Some Difficulty | Difference between no difficulty and some difficulty | At least a lot of difficulty | Difference between no difficulty and at least a lot of difficulty |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Multidimensional poverty headcount | 64 | 67 | -4*** | 92 | -28*** |
Less than primary school | 7 | 8 | -1 | 24 | -17*** |
Employment population ratio | 37 | 32 | 5*** | 7 | 30*** |
Safely managed drinking water | 78 | 80 | -2 | 73 | 5** |
Safely managed sanitation | 68 | 71 | -3*** | 73 | -5** |
Clean fuel | – | – | – | – | – |
Electricity | 99 | 98 | 1* | 98 | 0 |
Adequate housing | 10 | 9 | 0 | 6 | 4*** |
Owns assets | 56 | 53 | 3*** | 51 | 5*** |
Source: Tajikistan 2016 WASH, own calculations
Education
The share of adults who have less than primary school as their highest level of schooling attained is significantly higher among persons with at least a lot of functional difficulty (24%) compared to persons with some difficulty (8%) and persons with no difficulty (7%). This boils down to gaps of 1 percentage points (p.p.) between persons with some functional difficulty and persons with no difficulty and 17 p.p. between persons with at least a lot of functional difficulty and persons with no difficulty.
Work
Persons with at least a lot of functional difficulty have a lower employment population ratio (or share of the population working) than persons with no difficulty, at 7% and 37%, respectively. At 32%, persons with some difficulty also have a significantly lower employment population ratio than persons with no difficulty.
Health
There is a statistically significant difference in the rates of access to safely managed drinking water only between persons with at least a lot of functional difficulty and persons with no difficulty, at 73% and 78%, respectively. There are significant differences in terms of the rates of access to safely managed sanitation, with higher rates for persons with some difficulty and even higher rates for persons with at least a lot of difficulty.
Standard of Living
Rates of access to electricity are overall similar across the different functional difficulty groups.
Rates of adequate housing are lower among persons with some or at least a lot of difficulty compared to persons with no difficulty, but the difference is statistically significant only between persons with at least a lot of difficulty and persons with no difficulty. There are also significant differences in terms of the share of individuals who own assets, with lower rates for persons with some difficulty and even lower rates for persons with at least a lot of difficulty.
More results for Tajikistan are available in results tables on the ddi website.